Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawyer in Arkansas Investigating Defective Pain Implant Claims
Taylor King Law is an Arkansas-based injury law firm representing patients harmed by defective spinal cord stimulators. If you are searching for a spinal cord stimulator lawyer in Arkansas, our firm is actively investigating spinal cord stimulator lawsuits on behalf of residents who suffered serious complications after implantation.
If you or a loved one experienced worsening pain, device failure, infection, or required revision or removal surgery, you may be entitled to compensation.
Free consultation. No upfront costs. You pay nothing unless we win.
What Is a Spinal Cord Stimulator?
A spinal cord stimulator (SCS) is a surgically implanted medical device designed to treat chronic pain. The device delivers electrical impulses to the spinal cord in an effort to block pain signals before they reach the brain. Spinal cord stimulators are commonly marketed to patients suffering from back pain, nerve pain, failed back surgery syndrome, and other long-term pain conditions.
Manufacturers often promote these devices as safe, effective, and reversible. However, thousands of patients nationwide — including many in Arkansas — have reported severe complications following implantation.
According to an Associated Press investigation, spinal cord stimulators account for the third-highest number of medical device injuries reported to the FDA, with more than 8,000 injuries documented over a ten-year period.
If you were injured, an experienced spinal cord stimulator lawyer in Arkansas can help you understand your legal options.
Why Are Spinal Cord Stimulators Being Investigated?
Despite being advertised as a minimally invasive pain management solution, spinal cord stimulators have been linked to serious and sometimes permanent injuries. In many cases, patients report that the device failed to relieve pain or caused new medical problems that required additional surgeries.
Companies aggressively market stimulators as a safe antidote to the deadly opioid crisis and as a treatment for those in need of chronic pain relief. But the devices are more dangerous than patients were made aware.
Spinal cord stimulator lawsuits allege that manufacturers:
- Failed to adequately warn patients and doctors of known risks
- Released devices with design or manufacturing defects
- Downplayed complication rates in marketing materials
- Sold devices that were prone to failure, migration, or breakage
As a result, injured patients across Arkansas are seeking accountability for the harm they suffered.
Gaps in FDA Oversight and Device Safety Concerns
Spinal cord stimulators are classified as Class III medical devices, meaning they carry the highest risk and are supposed to undergo rigorous testing before approval. However, many spinal cord stimulators on the market today were significantly modified after initial approval.
Instead of conducting new clinical trials, manufacturers often relied on FDA Premarket Approval (PMA) supplements, a process that allows design and technology changes without additional human testing.
An investigation by the Associated Press found that between 1984 and 2018, the FDA approved just six new spinal cord stimulator systems, yet allowed hundreds of post-approval modifications to those devices. These changes included new programming features, wireless connectivity, battery redesigns, and other technological updates.
As a result, many spinal cord stimulators were cleared for patient use based on older studies of earlier devices, not the versions ultimately implanted, raising serious concerns about whether patients were fully informed of the risks.
Common Spinal Cord Stimulator Injuries
Patients who experienced complications after spinal cord stimulator implantation frequently report:
- Worsening or unrelieved chronic pain
- Device malfunction or sudden shutdown
- Lead migration or fractured leads
- Battery failure or overheating
- Severe infections at the implant site
- Electrical shock
- Need for revision or explant (removal) surgery
Additional injuries linked to SCS’s include:
- Gastroparesis
- Burns at the site of the device
- Urinary incontinence
- Neurological injury or nerve damage
- Dysphagia
- Loss of mobility or sensation
- Uncontrollable bowel movements
- Bouts of dizziness or fainting
- Cardiac Arrhythmia
- Permanent disability
Many patients require multiple corrective surgeries, prolonged hospitalization, or long-term medical care as a result of these complications. A qualified spinal cord stimulator lawyer in Arkansas can help determine whether these injuries may support a legal claim.
Who May Qualify for a Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit in Arkansas?
You may be eligible to pursue a spinal cord stimulator lawsuit if:
- You received a spinal cord stimulator implant
- You experienced serious complications or device failure
- Your pain worsened after implantation
- You developed an infection, nerve damage, or neurological injury
- You required revision surgery or complete removal of the device
- You were not fully warned of the risks before implantation
Even if your device has already been removed, you may still have a valid claim.
Arkansas law limits the time you have to file a claim, so speaking with a spinal cord stimulator lawyer in Arkansas as soon as possible is critical.
What Compensation May Be Available?
Victims of defective spinal cord stimulators may be entitled to financial compensation for:
- Past and future medical expenses
- Costs of revision or removal surgery
- Lost wages and reduced earning capacity
- Physical pain and emotional suffering
- Permanent injury or disability
- Loss of enjoyment of life
Every case is different. An experienced spinal cord stimulator lawyer in Arkansas can evaluate your case and explain what compensation may be available.
Spinal Cord Stimulator Manufacturers Under Investigation
Spinal cord stimulator claims may involve devices manufactured by major medical device companies, including:
- Boston Scientific
- Medtronic
- Abbott Laboratories (St. Jude Medical)
- Nevro
These investigations focus on whether certain SCS models were defectively designed, improperly manufactured, or sold without adequate warnings about serious risks.
Why Choose Taylor King Law?
Taylor King Law represents injured clients throughout Arkansas, including Little Rock, Fayetteville, Fort Smith, Springdale, Jonesboro, Arkadelphia, Conway, and surrounding communities. We focus on holding large corporations accountable when defective products cause harm.
When you work with our firm, you get:
- Over 300 years of combined product liability and mass tort experience
- Personalized, client-focused representation
- No upfront fees
- Payment only if we recover compensation
Our mission is to protect Arkansas families harmed by dangerous medical devices. We are proud to be the injury lawyers in Arkansas clients trust to fight for them for more than 30 years.
We will be “On Your Side – By Your Side” every step of the way.
Speak With an Arkansas Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawyer Today
If you or someone you love suffered complications after receiving a spinal cord stimulator, you do not have to face this alone. Taylor King Law is currently reviewing spinal cord stimulator injury claims for Arkansas residents.
Your consultation is free. There is no obligation.
Taylor King
Taylor King opened the first office in 1994 and has been practicing law for more than 30 years. Those who know him best would describe him as “laser-focused,” which is good news for his clients and bad news for his golf opponents.
Memberships & Professional History
- Arkansas Trial Lawyers Association
- Arkansas Bar Association
Frequently Asked Questions About Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuits
A spinal cord stimulator lawsuit is a legal claim brought by patients who were injured by a defective pain implant. These cases typically allege that manufacturers failed to warn of known risks or sold unsafe devices.
Spinal cord stimulators have been the subject of numerous FDA recalls due to safety issues. Since 2010, the FDA has issued dozens of recalls involving spinal cord stimulation devices from manufacturers such as Abbott, Boston Scientific, Medtronic, and others.
Common reasons for recall include:
- Battery and power failures
- Device fractures or lead migration
- Connection and communication issues
- Overheating
- Therapy delivered to the wrong area of the body
In 2023, the FDA issued a Class I recall — the most serious type — for more than 155,000 Abbott Proclaim™ and Infinity™ implantable pulse generators after Bluetooth connection failures prevented patients from resuming therapy following MRI scans. The FDA warned that some patients may require surgery to replace the affected devices.
Even if your specific device was not recalled, you may still have a valid claim if you were injured.
You may still qualify for a lawsuit even if the device has already been removed, especially if you required revision or explant surgery due to complications.
Arkansas law limits the amount of time you have to file a product liability lawsuit. Missing this deadline can permanently bar your claim, so speaking with an attorney promptly is critical. According to AR Code § 16-116-203 (2024) all product liability actions shall be commenced within three (3) years after the date on which the death, injury, or damage complained of occurs. You can trust Taylor King Law to help you determine eligibility.
Yes. Identifying the manufacturer can help determine whether your case may be part of a broader investigation or litigation involving similar devices. If you’re unsure about your options, our injury lawyers can help you determine a course of action.
Individuals who have experienced injuries or complications after using a spinal cord stimulator may be eligible for compensation.
Although you are not required to have an attorney, these cases are complex, and having experienced legal representation can significantly improve your ability to pursue fair compensation.
Our team is prepared to help you determine eligibility. Whether you choose to hire our firm or not, a product liability injury attorney with extensive experience can help you determine whether you qualify. Our injury lawyers will examine your case and ask questions to determine eligibility.